Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition by John T. E. Richardson (PDF)

Description

For years, both psychologists and the general public have been fascinated with the notion that there are gender differences in cognitive abilities; even now, flashy cover stories exploiting this idea dominate major news magazines, while research focuses on differences in verbal, mathematical, spatial, and scientific abilities across gender. This new volume in the Counterpoints series not only summarizes and addresses the validity (or invalidity) of such research, but also questions its ideology and consequences. Why do we search so intently for these differences? And what are the social and cultural implications of this relentless emphasis? Do biological mechanisms, in fact, contribute to the male-female differences in cognition? These are just a few of the questions generated by this controversial topic as it is debated throughout the book.

User’s Reviews

Editorial Reviews: Review “This evaluation of current research in gender studies as they relate to cognition should be of particular interest to psychologists, educators, and policy-makers.”–Shirley R. Rausher, Readings”Within the first pages, the authors focus their scholarly energies on verbal, spatial, and mathematical abilities because, we are told, researchers typically have searched for individual differences within such test domains. All four authors provide highly readable 30-page chapters, each taking a variation on the same perspective, i.e., that whatever cognitive differences you thought had been demonstrated between males and females should not be considered biological . . . This reviewer found the book’s contents highly stimulating and informative, providing both valid and pseudoarguments to reject the very existence of sex differences in verbal, spatial, mathematical, and scientific abilities. . . . future researchers ignore the message of this text at their peril.”–Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society”Results of some research suggest that gender differences have been growing smaller over recent decades. Here, five contributions discuss whether women and men differ in terms of their intellectual abilities; and, if there are differences, what are the origins–biology, childhood influences, cultural stereotypes? If there are no differences, why do people continue to assert that differences do exist? The essays discuss relevant research using the techniques of meta-analysis, pitfalls in the conception and execution of research on the topic, and the negative consequences of a focus on differences.”–Reference & Research Book News About the Author John T. E. Richardson is at Brunel University.

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐Editor J.T.E. Richardson wrote in the Preface to this 1997 book, “This contribution to the Counterpoints series is concerned with the issue of whether women and men differ in terms of their intellectual abilities. Women are sometimes said to outperform men in verbal ability, and men are sometimes said to outperform women in mathematical and spatial ability. Are these assertions true? If so, where should one look for the origins of these differences? In the biological makeup of women and men? In influences during childhood? Or in cultural stereotypes? Yet, if these assertions are not true, why do people continue to make them?” (Pg. v) The book contains five essays (two by Richardson).Richardson notes in his first article, “First, it is very important to clarify the distinction between `sex differences’ and `gender differences.’ `Sex’ marks an essentially biological distinction between women and men that may be based upon their anatomical, physiological, or chromosomal properties. `Gender’ marks a sociocultural distinction between men and women on the basis of the traits and behavior regarded as characteristic of and appropriate to the two groups of people… In most psychological research… it is appropriate to talk of `gender differences’ rather than ‘sex differences,’ because the participants are categorized on the basis of their outward appearance and behavior, not on the basis of biological characteristics.” (Pg. 7)Another essayist states, “if we assume that there actually has been a narrowing of the gender difference in cognitive abilities, which gender has been changing? For instance, in the case of mathematics performance, is it the result of an increase in the performance of females or a decline in the performance of males, or perhaps both? Conversely, in the case of verbal ability, is it the result of an increase in the performance of males or a decline in the performance of females?… In conclusion, meta-analysis does not allow us to make definitive statements about the reality or the causes of any findings of declining gender differences in abilities.” (Pg. 43)Another says, “it is clear that, just as with mathematical and spatial abilities, a person’s performance on many of the tests that are said to tap these abilities can be enhanced or impeded by a host of factors that no one would consider to be essentially verbal. As with other kinds of abilities, there has never been a consensus of what verbal abilities are… None of these definitional problems would matter as much if all of the above tests yielded the same result or at least the same pattern of results, but that is not the case. Females do not produce consistently higher scores on all of the tests that have been called ‘verbal.'” (Pg. 71-72)Another points out, “the single biggest influence upon mathematics performance is the number of mathematics courses previously taken… The mathematics performance of girls and boys diverges only in high school, when girls begin taking fewer mathematics courses. When course-taking is controlled, the sex differences nearly disappear… Even when they are taking the same courses, however, boys and girls experience different worlds in the classroom. We noted earlier that there is evidence for differential treatment of boys and girls, and this extends to courses in mathematics… The effect of gender was compounded with that of race in determining which students received their teachers’ attention.” (Pg. 105)Not a “popular overview” of the subject, these detailed technical articles will be of considerable interest to persons making a serious study of this subject.

⭐I learned something about my self as an introvert born with a brain that is more aroused by issues that make me feel I will never be a person that my four sisters want to listen to. Social order based on redaction according to rules that schools try to teach about language produce shock at the Basic Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, which includes his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. I am no expert on what French philosophers wrote before a French Revolution that celebrates July 14, 1789, but the Introduction sent to the Republic of Geneva on 12 June 1754 clearly mentioned asking if those who command are necessarily better than those who obey, or wisdom and virtue are always found in proportion to power or wealth.People are no longer trying to live like their lives have been opened to be redacted like a book. Progress no longer seems like quicker communications will avoid all the hacker spirit whirligigs that are chasing us now.

Keywords

Free Download Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition in PDF format
Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition PDF Free Download
Download Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition 1997 PDF Free
Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition 1997 PDF Free Download
Download Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition PDF
Free Download Ebook Gender Differences in Human Cognition (Counterpoints: Cognition, Memory, and Language) 1st Edition