Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt by Steven Johnson (PDF)

Description

“Thoroughly engrossing . . . a spirited, suspenseful, economically told tale whose significance is manifest and whose pace never flags.” —The Wall Street Journal From The New York Times–bestselling author of The Ghost Map and Extra Life, the story of a pirate who changed the world Henry Every was the seventeenth century’s most notorious pirate. The press published wildly popular—and wildly inaccurate—reports of his nefarious adventures. The British government offered enormous bounties for his capture, alive or (preferably) dead. But Steven Johnson argues that Every’s most lasting legacy was his inadvertent triggering of a major shift in the global economy. Enemy of All Mankind focuses on one key event—the attack on an Indian treasure ship by Every and his crew—and its surprising repercussions across time and space. It’s the gripping tale of one of the most lucrative crimes in history, the first international manhunt, and the trial of the seventeenth century. Johnson uses the extraordinary story of Henry Every and his crimes to explore the emergence of the East India Company, the British Empire, and the modern global marketplace: a densely interconnected planet ruled by nations and corporations. How did this unlikely pirate and his notorious crime end up playing a key role in the birth of multinational capitalism? In the same mode as Johnson’s classic nonfiction historical thriller The Ghost Map, Enemy of All Mankind deftly traces the path from a single struck match to a global conflagration.

User’s Reviews

Editorial Reviews: Review “A kaleidoscopic rumination on the ways in which a single event, and the actions of a handful of men with no obvious access to the levers of state power, can change the course of history. . . . Steven Johnson treats us to fascinating digressions on the origins of terrorism, celebrity and the tabloid media; the tricky physics of cannon manufacture; and the miserable living conditions of the average seventeenth-century seaman.” —The New York Times Book Review “Steven Johnson argues with verve and conviction in his thoroughly engrossing Enemy of All Mankind … Because Enemy of All Mankind offers, among its many pleasures, a solid mystery story, it would be wrong to reveal the outcome. But it’s surprising. So, too, are the many larger themes that Mr. Johnson persuasively draws from his seaborne marauders…All the author’s more surprising suppositions are not merely stapled onto the narrative but seem to have grown there effortlessly during the course of a spirited, suspenseful, economically told tale whose significance is manifest and whose pace never flags.” —The Wall Street Journal “… [a] page-turner of a book … we can thank Johnson for combing the archives, describing in vivid detail the life of pirates that we thought we knew—most likely through motion pictures—when in truth we didn’t … Enemy of all Mankind covers lots of territory, including the beginnings of the British Empire, and it’s a good read, made all the better by Johnson’s clever storytelling and an unforgettable pirate named Henry Every.” —The Washington Post “It is the perfect book to cozy up to during a pandemic. . . . In addition to providing captivating ‘yo ho ho and a bottle of rum’ action, the author examines the geopolitical and cultural implications of Every’s spasm of violence. His subject changed the very nature and geography of piracy in the eighteenth century.” —USA Today “Enough adventures to fill a Netflix series . . . [Johnson] skillfully makes sweeping historical points from bloody swashbuckling details.” —Star Tribune “… entertaining and erudite … Johnson’s lucid prose and sophisticated analysis brings these events to vibrant life. This thoroughly enjoyable history reveals how a single act can reverberate across centuries.” —Publishers Weekly (starred review) “Johnson is one of those polymath writers who links events and subjects most of us wouldn’t see as related, always to enlightening effect … intriguing…relevant to our own world. Johnson doesn’t just write about the heyday of piracy; he connects it to the growth of nation-states, the history of the first multinational corporation, the origins of democracy and the birth of the tabloid media, among other things … an amazing story, but the real one Johnson tells in Enemy of All Mankind is even more so.” —The Tampa Bay Times “Johnson weaves a tapestry of treasure, tribunals, emperors, atrocities, and a pirate’s life at sea … Consummate popular history: fast-paced, intelligent, and entertaining.” —Library Journal About the Author Steven Johnson is the bestselling author of thirteen books, including Where Good Ideas Come From, How We Got to Now, The Ghost Map, and Extra Life. He’s the host and cocreator of the Emmy-winning PBS/BBC series How We Got to Now, the host of the podcast The TED Interview, and the author of the newsletter Adjacent Possible. He lives in Brooklyn, New York, and Marin County, California, with his wife and three sons. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1 Origin Stories Newton Ferrers, DevonshireAugust 20, 1659 Sometime around the year 1670, a young man from Devon in the West Country of England joined the Royal Navy. Given that he would spent the rest of his adult life on the water, it is possible that he willingly volunteered for service. There were economic advantages to volunteering: the navy offered two months’ salary in advance, though it was expected that the new recruit would spend some of those funds purchasing equipment (including the hammock they would sleep in on board). New volunteers were also protected from creditors if they owed less than £20. But roughly half the sailors in the Royal Navy had been forced into service thanks to one of the most notorious institutions of the period: the impress service. To be a young man in England in the seventeenth century-particularly a young man of limited means-was to live with a constant background fear of the impress service, roving bands of informal agents for the Royal Navy known colloquially as “press-gangs.” Impressment was a kind of hybrid of the modern military draft and state-sponsored kidnapping. A seventeen-year-old could be standing on a street corner, minding his own business, and out of nowhere a press-gang could swoop in and make him a Godfather-style offer he couldn’t refuse: he could voluntarily join the navy, or he could be forced into service under worse terms. The choice was his to make-as long as it ended up with him on a Royal Navy ship. Newly impressed sailors confronted a grim reality once they had been loaded onto the guard ships where the men were held until they could be assigned to a specific ship. An eighteenth-century tract called The Sailors Advocate described the scene: “They found seldom less aboard the Guard-ship, than six, seven, or eight hundred at a time in the same condition that they were in, without common conveniences, being all forced to lie between decks, confined as before, and to eat what they could get, having seldom victuals enough dressed, which occasioned distempers, that sometimes six, eight, and ten, died a day; and some were drowned in attempting their escape, by swimming from the Guard-ship; many of whose bodies were seen floating upon the River. . . .” Impressment arose in part because the age of exploration created a demand for labor at sea that could not be met through normal financial incentives. But it also arose because of changes on land. The shift from late feudalism to early agrarian capitalism, the great disruption that would fuel the growth of the metropolitan centers in the coming centuries, had disgorged a whole class of society-small, commons-based cottage laborers-and turned them into itinerant free agents. By the late 1500s, the explosion of vagabonds made them public enemy number one, triggering one of the first true moral panics of the post-Gutenberg era. Everywhere there were wanderers, whole families lost in the changing economic landscape. Serfs once grounded in a coherent, if oppressive, feudal system found themselves flotsam on the twisting stream of early capitalism. To everyone sitting on the banks above that stream, the change must have seemed something like the modern fantasies of zombie invasions: you wake up one day and realize that the streets are filled with people who not only lack homes, but also suffer from some other, more existential form of homelessness-not even knowing what kind of home they should be seeking. In 1597 Parliament passed a vagrancy act that attempted to combat the scourge of homelessness. The language of the act includes an almost comical catalog of the various species of vagabonds currently at large on the public roads and in the town squares of England: Wandering scholars seeking alms; shipwrecked seamen, idle persons using subtle craft in games or in fortune telling; pretended proctors, procurers, or gatherers of alms for institutions; fencers, bear wards, common players, or minstrels; jugglers, tinkers, peddlers and petty chapmen; able-bodied wandering persons and laborers refusing to work for current rate of wages; discharged pensioners; wanderers pretending losses by fire; Egyptians or gypsies. The Vagabond Act had a clear message to local authorities: any of these characters were to be “stripped naked from the middle upwards and openly whipped until his or her body be bloody, and then passed to his or her birthplace or last residence.” But the act also empowered the press-gangs. If the wandering scholars and jugglers didn’t want to be stripped naked and openly whipped, they could always join the Royal Navy. What better way to clear the streets of the refugees from a fallen feudal order than to send them off to sea? Whether he joined the Royal Navy on his own accord or was forced into service by the press-gangs, the Devonshire sailor would have grown up in a culture that was heavily shaped by stories of seafaring life. No region of Britain is more closely associated with maritime adventure than the West Country, the rugged moorlands that jut out into the Atlantic, wedged between the English and Bristol Channels. Almost all the legendary sea dogs of the Elizabethan age hailed from the region. Both Walter Raleigh and Francis Drake were born in Devon. While the West Country mariners led many naval battles on behalf of the Crown-including the sinking of the Spanish Armada in 1588-many of them also crossed over into piracy. (The two most notorious pirates of the 1700s-“Black Sam” Bellamy and Blackbeard-were also West Country natives.) The prominence of the swashbuckling lifestyle had geological roots: the West Country’s position at the mouth of the English Channel gave its captains unrivaled access to the shipping networks of Europe, and the many coves and inlets carved into the coastline made the landscape ideal for smugglers. The link between piracy and Devonshire lives on in our speech patterns more than three hundred years after that Devonshire boy first joined the navy. When we adopt a stereotypical pirate accent today-“Arr, shiver me timbers”-we are, unconsciously, mimicking the lilt and idiosyncratic grammar of West Country-vernacular English. The mystery that surrounds the life of the Devonshire sailor begins with his name. The first biographical account of his exploits, published in 1709, referred to him as Captain John Avery. As a young man, he seems to have briefly adopted the alias of Benjamin Bridgeman, though his nickname, “Long Ben,” has led some historians to speculate that Bridgeman was his original name and Avery the alias. Most scholars agree that he was born near Plymouth, in Devonshire, on the southwest coast of England. An acquaintance would testify under oath in 1696 that the sailor was a man of about forty years of age, dating his birth back to the late 1650s. Parish records in Newton Ferrers, a village on the River Yealm southeast of Plymouth, note the birth of a child to John and Anne Avery on August 20, 1659. Perhaps that child grew up to be the notorious Henry Avery, the most wanted criminal on earth. Or perhaps the real Avery was born in another West Country village in that same period. In part because a family by the name of Every had been prominent landowners in Devonshire for centuries before his birth, many accounts of his life refer to him as Henry Every. Almost every legal document written in English that would eventually mention his name spelled it “Every,” and the one piece of his correspondence that survives was signed “Henry Every.” Every was the name most often invoked by the public after he became one of the most notorious men in the world. For that reason alone, it seems appropriate to call him Henry Every. Almost nothing is known about Henry Every’s childhood. A memoir published in 1720 keeps his early years heavily veiled: “In the present Account, I have taken no Notice of my Birth, Infancy, Youth, or any of that Part; which, as it was the most useless Part of my Years to myself so ’tis the most useless to any one that shall read this Work to know, being altogether barren of any Thing remarkable in it self, or instructing to others.” Given that this memoir was almost certainly a sham-some believe it was, in fact, the work of Daniel Defoe-the omission of childhood details most likely reflects how barren the historical record was, and not the uselessness of Every’s actual upbringing. No doubt young Henry Every (or Avery or Bridgeman) grew up hearing folk tales about the globetrotting exploits of Drake and Raleigh, both of whom skirted the line that separated pirate from privateer in their careers at sea. (As we will see, the legal conventions of the period kept that line deliberately blurry.) The faux memoirs claim that his father had served in the Royal Navy as a trading captain; the Devonshire Every clan included at least a few captains in their family tree. Whatever the details, Every seems to have been, as he puts it in the fictional memoirs, “bred to the Sea from a Youth.” Appropriately enough, the first real biographical detail we have of Every’s life-beyond those parish records in Newton Ferrers-is that he joined the Royal Navy, likely as a teenager. The fog around the birth of that Devonshire sailor is almost as thick as the one that surrounds his death. The truth is we don’t really know when or where he was born, or even what his name actually was. It is fitting that there should be a certain blurriness to Henry Every’s roots. All the great legends have palimpsest narratives of their origins, different plots layered and threaded together through rumor and hearsay and the subtle transformations that befall any story passed down from generation to generation. For a time, Henry Every was a legend as widely known as any in the pantheon, a hero and inspiration to some, a ruthless killer to others. He was a mutineer, a working class hero, an enemy of the state, and a pirate king. And then he became a ghost. 2 The Uses of Terror The Nile Delta1179 BCE To modern eyes, the hieroglyphs that line the external northwest wall of Medinet Habu, the Mortuary Temple of Ramses III, are inscrutable, written in a language that only a small group of Egyptologists can now read. But the images etched in bas-relief on the temple walls are easily deciphered. They depict a scene of terrible carnage: warriors carrying javelins and daggers, fortified by shields and Aegean armor, fending off a shower of arrows; an officer wearing Egyptian headgear a split second away from decapitating a fallen enemy; a bloodied mound of corpses signaling the total annihilation of the invading forces. The images-and the hieroglyphs beside them-tell the story of one of the ancient world’s largest naval battles, the clash between Egyptian forces and a band of itinerant raiders known today as the Sea Peoples. Because it left behind archaeological wonders like the temple of Ramses III and the pyramids, not to mention the treasures of Tutankhamun, the Egyptian dynasty to which Ramses III belonged has long held a vivid place in our historical imagination. Every grade-schooler can tell you something about the pharaohs. The Sea Peoples did not attract the same legacy, largely because they spent most of their prime living an entirely nautical existence. They did not leave temples or monuments behind to astound tourists three thousand years after their demise. They did not pioneer new forms of agriculture, or compose philosophical tracts. They left no written records at all. But the Sea Peoples should loom larger in the modern memory of the ancient world for one reason. They were the first pirates. The geographic origins of the Sea Peoples remain a matter of debate among historians. The prevailing theory is that the Sea Peoples were a collection of refugees from Mycenaean Greece who first took shape as a coherent cultural group at the end of the Bronze Age. Some of them were warriors and mercenaries, others ordinary laborers who had previously been employed at borderline slave wages building the immense infrastructure and fortifications that marked the heyday of the Mycenaean age: the network of roads in the Peloponnese or the deepwater harbor at Pylos. Their origins are necessarily murky because the Sea Peoples ultimately became, like so many pirate communities since, a multiethnic group, defined not by their allegiance to a single city-state or emperor, but rather by their own elective allegiance to the floating community they had formed. Their homeland was the Mediterranean, and the ships they sailed upon it. They built customs and codes that helped define their tribal identity: they sported distinctive horned helmets-clearly visible in the Ramses III engravings-and their ships were adorned with figureheads of birds. But what made them so unusual was their rootlessness, both in the sense of leaving behind their geographic homelands and of being perpetually in motion, never stopping long enough to put down roots. That rootlessness implied a political stance, one that would be adopted by the most radical of pirates in the centuries to come. The Sea Peoples did not respect the authority of the existing land-based regimes that surrounded the Mediterranean. They were not bound by the laws of terrestrial states. This is one of the key ways in which the Sea Peoples mark the point of origin for piracy as a form of self-identity. Before the Sea Peoples, there were no doubt acts of piracy committed on the open sea; as soon as human beings began transporting valuable goods via ship, you can be sure there were criminals scheming to intercept those vessels and run off with the loot. But a true pirate is not just a subclass of criminal like a bank robber or a petty thief. Most people we consider to be criminals are people who break the law deliberately, but who still, in other aspects of their lives, acknowledge the rule of law. They get driver’s licenses, and pay taxes, and vote. They consider themselves citizens, just not entirely law-abiding ones. To be a true pirate implies a broader disavowal. The pirate renounces the long-distance authorities of nations and empires. This is why the pirate flags that every grade-schooler can recognize today-centuries after they were last flown in earnest-carried so much symbolic heft. The pirate sails beneath the colors of his or her own rogue state, “reckless wanderers of the sea,” as Homer described them in The Odyssey, “who live to prey on other men.” Not all pirates were willing to make such a complete break with their national allegiances, of course. (The tension between open rebellion and patriotic loyalty would shape many of the events in Henry Every’s brief career as a pirate.) But the pirates’ willingness to challenge the legal and geographic boundaries of state power-not to mention their fondness for pillaging-made them frequent enemies of centralized authority. Nimble, unburdened by legal or moral restraints or by state bureaucracies, the pirates had many advantages over their larger antagonists. But they were not invulnerable to a concerted effort by a centralized government to defeat them. In 1179 BCE, the Sea Peoples launched an attack on Ramses’s forces in the Nile Delta. Anticipating their attack, the pharaoh had constructed ships designed specifically to combat the Sea Peoples’ naval advantage. He set up a network of scouts to watch for invading ships, and anchored his new fleet just out of sight in the many channels feeding the delta. The drawings at Medinet Habu show the Sea Peoples without oars in their galleys, suggesting that they were ambushed. The scenes bring to mind the storming of the beaches at Normandy: a scattered mass of boats washing ashore and men scrambling off into the waves, only to be picked off by distant Egyptian archers. Many bled to death in the shallow water. Read more

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐Enemy of All Mankind, A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global ManhuntSteven Johnson, 2020In recent history, global terrorists have writ large in international affairs, politics, history, and news. Who were the first global terrorists? Starting in the 17th century and continuing into most of the 18th century Pirates were the scourge of global commerce. Steven Johnson tells the story of the first world famous terrorist and pirate; a man known by the name of Henry Every. He appears in history at the end of the 17th century. This was a time of a burgeoning world trade, a time of the first joint stock trans-national corporations and a time of a nascent popular press that would glamorize the rakish exploits of pirates.Along with the Dutch East India company, The British East India Company were the harbingers of the coming predominance of corporations in the both the generation and concentration of wealth, national and international commerce. In the early 17th century most of eastern India was ruled by the Mughal empire, a Moslem autocracy headquartered in the city of Agra. The Portuguese founded the first trading colony at the city of Surat in the late 16th century and its trade was mainly centered on spices and cotton. In the 17th century the British East India company was able to establish a competing trading base which capitalized on a growing demand in England for cotton and calico fabrics.This book is the saga of one of the most audacious and world changing heists to ever occur. Henry Avery came into possession of one the fastest, cutting edge warships of the time, first owned by another corporation in Spanish, Caribbean trade. Every was able to commandeer the ship by employing a mutiny of disgruntled and abused sailors. His target was the Grand Mughal’s treasure ship which made an annual trip to Mecca each year. On board this huge ship of 1500 tons was not only vast quantities of gold and silver but also members of the Mughal’s harem as well as family members. When the ship was attacked, looted and when the passengers were raped and abused by Every’s crew, huge repercussions were experienced by the East India company. Employees of the company were arrested and confined in the port cities of Surat and Bombay. Only restitution of the losses by the company and a promise to protect the sea lanes to Mecca would suffice to restore relations with the Grand Mughal. Fascinating is the fact that this led to the beginning of the militarization of the East India company, a development that within fifty years would lead the company to assume all the governmental duties for all of India. There are many interesting details here of the functioning of the East India company both in India but also England: Insider stock manipulation, political influence buying, corruption of local officials are examples of corporate malfeasance still very much with us today.Back in England the outrage perpetrated by Every and his crew leads to a global manhunt. Piracy before his time was tolerated and rewarded to a certain extent especially if the target was a country that was either on a war footing or had bad relations with England and especially if the spoils were shared with the Crown. Sir Francis Drake is an example of this type of individual. Every violated all these rules because he commandeered corporate private property, the ship, he was attacking the viability of a corporation, The East India Corporation, with many rich and influential stockholders and he wasn’t into sharing any spoils with anyone.The book looks at the lives of typical seamen of the 17th century. Many seamen of that era were impressed into service in the Royal Navy. Wages were meager and life on a ship of that era was miserable. 100s of sailors were crammed together below decks with 5 foot ceiling heights, airless, dank quarters. Food was moldy and contaminated with worms. Disease was rampant including Typhus, Scurvy and dysentery so one’s chances of returning home were chancy at best. Given these conditions Piracy would in some cases seem an attractive option. In fact, the term “strike” as related to labor disputes derives from the refusal of abused, complaining crewmembers to strike or raise the sails to allow the ship to proceed. On a Royal Navy or commercial vessel of the time. The Captain was supreme and could dictate all behavior and punishments on his vessel. If a group of common seamen were to organize a society free from authoritarianism and the power of wealth, what type of society would they create? In fact, the pirate codes can answer that question. Their codes incorporated the very democratic principles that would surface a century later in the American and French revolutions. The pirate ship was a floating democracy with the egalitarian principles of one man one vote to determine who were their leaders including captain, the course of action taken as well as how the spoils would be divided.Besides the historical context and information contained, the book is also a crime thriller. How do the pirates pull off their heist? How will they try to escape? Will the authorities manage to catch them and what kind of justice will be meted out? This is the narrative that ties the book together and makes it a not to be put down page turner.That said; “One of the most striking things about Every and his crew is the ability of such a small group of humans- working entirely outside the official institutions of power to trigger events that would be heard around the world. The mix of fear, admiration, and disproportionate influence that Every unleashed on the planet, represented a turning point in the evolution of the world system. It is a script we know by heart in the age of al-Qaeda and ISIS; rogue agents working outside the confines of traditional nation-states, using an act of violence to spark a geopolitical crisis and a global manhunt. But the first draft of that script was written by Every and his men more than three centuries ago.” Deja-Vue all over again. JACK

⭐1. The author does a good job of entertaining the reader with interesting “pirate facts” throughout the book. This book will teach you about how the first pirates were Egyptian pirates that Dominated the Carribien. You’ll also learn about where the term “enemy of all mankind” originated from and that the difference between a Pirate and a “privateer” was. You’ll even come to realize that being a crew member on a pirate ship was an even worse experience than being a lower-level employee on a cruise ship (which is a terrible experience by the way). With the one difference being that piracy offered a potential “rags to riches” and “nobody to famous” opportunity that working on a cruise ship does not.2. The author does a good job of setting up the historical events that created just the right circumstances for Henrey to thrive as a pirate. A. The invention/ spread of newspapers and other mediums enabled pirates to become popular, which is how Henrey discovered Piracy in the first place.B. The development of the Indian East trading company provided pirates with more potential trading ships to target (and also introduced a new way to make money). The book goes back and forth between this company, and Henrey’s crew because these two entities are deeply connected. Henry wouldn’t have achieved what he achieved without this company, and the company wouldn’t have achieved what it achieved without Henrey. 2. The author does a great job of “filling in the gaps” that can’t be filled with direct historical accounts in regards to Henry’s story. He conducted extensive research on the time Henry’s life takes place, which enabled him to produce various educated guesses on what likely happened in the “gap” of a particular event. 3. The author does a great job of breaking down the legal proceedings within the infamous court trial that took place involving Henry’s men. Despite not being a lawyer himself the author did a good job of analyzing and describing what went on.Cons 1. I don’t mind the book going into details about characters/ other elements beyond their relation to Henry. But the author goes on a bit too much about the other interesting but off-topic details. This book spends more time focusing on everyone and everything else that in some way contributed to Henrey’s success instead of focusing on Henrey specifically.

⭐I found this book fascinating (and very easy to read). Johnson gives great details and wide context for every step of the story. Certainly he has made a great deal of research and for history lovers this book is very informative. I cannot understand the disparaging and dismissive comments of some reviewers. I have read classic, acclaimed biographies of Elizabethan sailors and privateers yet have learned a good deal about piracy, the East India Co. and the beginnings of world trade and colonialism from this book quite apart from its basic story of Henry Every whom I had no knowledge of previously. Where this book might have been improved would be a better map and some useful illustrations of the ships involved, etc. However, I look forward to reading another of Johnson’s books.

⭐The historical research for this book is outstanding. Yet it is not written as a dry textbook, but as a story that, in most places, moves along at the pace of a thriller. The meeting of two ships, one an Indian treasure-ship, the other an English pirate ship, was fortuitously decided in favour of the pirated, even though the Indian ship was far more heavily armed. What followed immediately after the capture was a disgrace, and the book deals with the fall-out from the incident, which had major repercussions for the East India Company and the British Government. It also explains how and why a young man keen to join the Royal Navy turned into a pirate captain. I found a few things confusing, e.g. the section about when the pirates took over their ship and released those who did not want to become pirates to return to shore, but given the distance in time that is not surprising; it could have been written. Bit more clearly though. The book fascinates throughout, and is a compelling read.

⭐An excellent historical treatise on the greatest piracy that occurred in waters off the west coast of India! The owner of the ship, was the then richest person in the world! A thoroughly researched historical work!

⭐The story is interesting but the author is not a good writer. He does not use words well. It reads a bit like a high school book report, tainted by a slightly desperate attempt to make it all seem really insightful and important. It’s neither.

⭐Page-turner book that enmesses different historial passages to create a captivating story around the adventures of an English pirate and his impact around the world at the time and in future generations

Keywords

Free Download Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt in PDF format
Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt PDF Free Download
Download Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt 2020 PDF Free
Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt 2020 PDF Free Download
Download Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt PDF
Free Download Ebook Enemy of All Mankind: A True Story of Piracy, Power, and History’s First Global Manhunt