Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost by Jonathan Fenby (PDF)

Description

Chiang Kai-shek was the man who lost China to the Communists. As leader of the nationalist movement, the Kuomintang, Chiang established himself as head of the government in Nanking in 1928. Yet although he laid claim to power throughout the 1930s and was the only Chinese figure of sufficient stature to attend a conference with Churchill and Roosevelt during the Second World War, his desire for unity was always thwarted by threats on two fronts. Between them, the Japanese and the Communists succeeded in undermining Chiang’s power-plays, and after Hiroshima it was Mao Zedong who ended up victorious. Brilliantly re-creating pre-Communist China in all its colour, danger and complexity, Jonathan Fenby’s magisterial survey of this brave but unfulfilled life is destined to become the definitive account in the English language.

User’s Reviews

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐This important book fills a glaring void that exists in the historical record of modern China. While historians have always provided ready attention to Mao Zedong and communist China, they never accorded the same serious examination to the role and legacy of Chiang Kai-shek. Before this book, most of the resources on Chiang dated from the 1970s and earlier, largely consisting of hagiographic accounts penned by pro-KMT Chinese living in Taiwan or abroad, or similar propaganda fluff pieces financed by the Henry Luce China Lobby. A well-reasoned, independent account of Chiang’s life was thus long overdue, and Fenby comes through in a huge way.He writes an engaging narrative of Chiang, a person of quite humble origins, who became one of the world’s most famous and powerful figures. Fenby also provides detailed, careful background on the China of Chiang’s time, particularly that of the 1911 Revolution and subsequent warlord period. This is important in understanding why Chiang allied with the types of people and strata of society that he did, and why this alliance alienated vast numbers of Chinese, providing moral fodder and legitimacy for the alternative offered by Mao. Much of Fenby’s information regarding Chiang’s early political career comes from an autobiography written by his largely-forgotten second wife, Chen Jieru (Jennie). While this relationship is common knowledge in Taiwan, she is practically unknown in the west. Her book is entitled Chiang Kai-shek’s Secret Past, and what Fenby was able to glean from it has whetted my appetite to read the book myself.Fenby is at his best when he examines the decades-long struggle for control of China between Chiang and Mao. Indeed, theirs was a clash of legendary, tragic proportions, and it is hard to find a more riveting story elsewhere in history, not just because of the mythic stature and personal auras these two men obtained during their own lifetimes, but also due to the enormous cruelty and unimaginable suffering both inflicted on the country they would rule and the populace they would win to their cause. Chapter 15, “The Long Chase” opens with a brilliant juxtaposition between the two, and proceeds to analyze the showdown during the Long March in which Mao gained primacy in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the CCP escaped certain extinction during Chiang’s Fifth Extermination Campaign in Jiangxi. He attributes the CCP’s success in escaping to Yan’an, not as the result of a secret deal Chiang brokered with Moscow to guarantee the return of his son Chiang Ching-kuo, as argued by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday in their biography of Mao, but to the superior strategy of Mao and Zhu De: they planned the route through areas of the country largely held by warlords who often actively assisted the Red Army in getting through their territories, or gave passive half-hearted chase, because the last thing they wanted was Chiang coming in with his huge armies and wresting political control away from them.The book does have two important weaknesses, one minor and one major. First, Fenby provides little insight into what I think would be one of the most important and intriguing relationships of Chiang’s life, that with his son Chiang Ching-kuo. Ching-kuo, after all, publicly denounced his father after the 1927 White Terror purges in Shanghai and Guangzhou, and attempted to join the Communist Party while living in the USSR. However, Fenby spends hardly any time at all with them. Considering the role that Ching-kuo played later in the democratization of Taiwan, this is unfortunate.Fenby devotes three chapters and 65 pages to the stormy relationship between General Joseph Stilwell and Chiang Kai-shek. It is in his negative assessment of General Stilwell where his normally astute and deft powers of analysis fail him when he needs them most. It is not my desire here to delve too deeply into Stilwell’s legacy or become embroiled in the Stilwell vs. Claire Chennault debate, but as Fenby comes perilously close to maligning Stilwell’s military competence, I feel I must come to his defense, because for all his faults, General Stilwell was truly a great American and a first-rate military mind. He earned the trust and respect of the highest leadership in the US military and received promotion over those much senior to him, at the insistence of no less than Marshall and Eisenhower, two of the finest generals America has ever produced.When describing Stilwell’s march of his command out of Burma into India, an epic journey of over 150 miles taken under extreme conditions and threat of imminent discovery by the Japanese imperial army, Fenby terms it a `grave dereliction of duty’, because he argues that Stilwell should have stayed behind to organize the retreat of other Chinese units in the theater. It is important to realize the true situation: the Japanese had put the Allies to rout. Commands and units had completely disintegrated by this point. Indeed, Fenby notes just a few pages earlier that before the main Japanese advance had even begun, Chinese commanders refused to obey Stilwell’s orders (almost certainly under instructions from Chiang) and rather than send needed supplies and materiel to units on the front lines, Chinese commanders were hoarding these and trucking them back to China to sell on the black market. Once the Japanese began their assault, there was soon no `retreat’ left for Stilwell to organize. In this case, he did what duty required of him: save his personal command. This he accomplished admirably: not one of the persons in his care perished or fell into Japanese hands.Fenby seems to have bought into Chennault’s air-intensive strategy as the way to defeat the Japanese in China, yet he never does manage to explain how air power can be the decisive factor when there is no means to defend air bases with no adequate ground support, and there would be insufficient supply lines for fuel and parts without ground troops defending the major supply routes from India. These were Stilwell’s main arguments as to the necessity to win back Burma. Fenby overstates the effectiveness of Chennault’s air battles, not surprising since his sources on this come only from autobiographies by Chennault himself and one of his men. This is a disappointing lapse of scrutiny by Fenby.It is also important to note that on practically every point concerning Chiang, his military ineffectiveness and strategic incompetence, his regime, the venal corruption of the KMT and its likelihood of success in a civil war against the CCP, subsequent events proved General Stilwell correct, and Chennault, Henry Luce and countless others wrong. In fact, Fenby even quotes Chennault as absurdly saying that “I think the Generalissimo is one of the two or three greatest military and political leaders in the world today.”Notwithstanding these faults, Fenby gets the big picture right. His depiction of China’s domestic situation and the political machinations of the KMT and CCP is compelling, absorbing history. He is fair-handed in his treatment to both sides, and is horribly effective in revealing the brutality of the Japanese occupation. Fenby manages to present a sympathetic portrait of Chiang, at his heart a true nationalist and personally incorruptible, but a man too bound by his steeply conservative Confucian tradition, enamored with fascism, and blind to the corruption of his family and associates, to ever have a hope of realizing his ultimate ambition.

⭐This is a great look at China in the early part of the 20th century. We look at Chiang from his birth to the defeat of the Nationalists by the Communists and them fleeing to Taiwan, which has an impact still to this day. Chiang lived through and eventually had an impact on an extremely interesting period of Chinese and Far Eastern history, from the fall of the Imperial Dynasty of China, the Warlord period, the brief period of stability as China was supposedly unified under a Nationalist government to the Japanese Invasions and the long struggle against them and then the final defeat by the Communists under Mao. Any one of these events could be a book in themselves, yet the author gives them, on the whole justice here.This book generally follows a linear narrative into Chiang’s life, except for the first chapter, where Chiang was captured by some of his own troops, led by one of the former Warlords and forced to cancel the planned attack against the Communists and focus on the Japanese instead (a truly pivotal moment indeed, who knows where we would be if the Communists had been defeated then). We get information about all the major palyers during this period and insights into Chiang’s life, sparing no details and not hiding any aspect of Chiang 9his time in Shanghai was very enlightening)The only real complaint that I had was that the final struggle with the Communists was rushed and Chiang’s life in Taiwan was not covered at all really. Otherwise this is an excellent biography and look at this most interesting time of CHina

⭐I started this book with minimal knowledge of China in the first half of the 20th century, beyond a knowledge of the key events. After reading Jonathan Fenby’s magnus opus at 500 pages that gap in my knowledge has been very well filled. Using the life of Chiang Kai-Shek (CSK) up to his establishing of the National government in exile in Formosa (now Taiwan) this book is an excellent coverage of the history of China to 1950, very well wrtitten and great command of many sources and consistent probing analysis of the issues and problems CSK and China faced.The sub title of the book “And the China he lost” is the key – Fenby uses the life of CSK from humble beginnings to show that while he may have had a major impact in uniting post Manchu China, he consistently by personal failings and lack of realism to see himself as other than the divine national leader of China whose word was law and to delegate power, left it open to the eventual communist takeover under Mao, a man who operated a similar autocratic approach but was pragmatic enough to create the rural revolution needed.The first half of Fenby’s book is about CSK’s success at overcoming the various regional warlords whose feudal approach to local power and unwillingness to accept central government reads like England in the Middle Ages. However while this may count as CSK’s great success it also showed many of the issues to come. CSK’s military prowess was based on a mix of foreign military advisers (first Russian then German) and the use of bribery rather than personal military skills to often win victories. While making certain initial military reforms, CSK was unable to accept the wider need to invest in a high quality army relying on size and loyalty rather than skill and focus.Having formed a loose regional federation, CSK then failed to seize the initiative to introduce much needed rural reform and instead aligned himself by marriage with corrupt urban wealthy families and launched a series of vicious attacks on the infant Communist party. His near success in eradicating the Communists was devastated by the Japanese invasion of China and the continual loss at great cost in lives of large and important areas of China to Japanese rule.Even when presented with the golden opportunity of USA support post Pearl Harbour the opportunities were spurned due largely to CSK’s nationalist attitude and lack of pragmatism and reality as to what was happening in China plus endless arguing with his US advisers who he saw threatening his authority. His endless meddling in military matters by issuing numerous orders when he was far from the front or executing a sound strategy plus the increasing corruption of his close followers meant that the Japanese were not pushed back and the Communists were able to survive and prosper.With the end of WWII, CSK again took a gamble in the hope of playing off Russia and USA influences under the Cold War to survive but underestimated their lack of support based on his WWII performance – once his armies had to face down the communists his poor military skills became clear and the end was quick. Consistent to the end he ensured a retreat to exile inFormosa with troops and gold leaving China to its fate but only after wreaking his final vengeance in murdering Chinese allies who he felt had betrayed him.One finishes the book clear that while CSK may have had a major impact on China it came at a great cost and with little real chance of long term success given his inability to react correctly to changes in Chinese society and economy and foreign forces.

⭐It must be a challenge many history writers face, weighing how much evidence to include in a book without affecting readability. Fenby gets it mostly right, and makes up for the stodgier passages with some lively sections dedicated to great personalities like Chiang’s wife.Fenby should also be applauded for exposing Chiang as the detestable dictator he clearly was without taking the sensationalist route Chang & Halliday took on their Mao grimoire.

⭐A well researched and written book. THere were a few factual errors and was a little biased toward Chiang, otherwise an excellent read.

⭐This book is colourful… the description, the soul of Chiang’s life, leak from the pages as you read. Fenby not only writes as biographer but he writes as a historian. It helped me greatly with my coursework, but also allowed me to visualise the murky streets of Shanghai, the intrigues of the Green Gang, the fascinating, differing personalities of the Soong sisters and the man himself, Chiang Kai Shek in a completely new and exciting way.

Keywords

Free Download Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost in PDF format
Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost PDF Free Download
Download Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost 2015 PDF Free
Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost 2015 PDF Free Download
Download Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost PDF
Free Download Ebook Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the China He Lost