On Bullshit 1st Edition by Harry G. Frankfurt (PDF)

4

 

Ebook Info

  • Published: 2009
  • Number of pages: 73 pages
  • Format: PDF
  • File Size: 1.28 MB
  • Authors: Harry G. Frankfurt

Description

A #1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLEROne of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, “we have no theory.”Frankfurt, one of the world’s most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all.Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner’s capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.

User’s Reviews

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐Harry G. Frankfurt’s On Bullshit is in my view hilarious and heartbreaking.As for the latter, the distinctions in the book between lies, bullshit, humbug (new ways of viewing a different attitude related to bullshit like a second cousin), and intention had me reflecting on relationships with friends, family, and partners or dating. Even groups I serve(d) from military to boards, jobs in teaching, to politics, and people I’ve looked up to.The former, hilarious, relates to my reflection and laughing at how obvious BS is when I understand the difference between this and a ‘bold-faced’ lie. Or, a lie of perception with supporting facts based on the side of belief the individual is on. Having had a relationship with bullshitters is funny in contexts upon reading now. How obvious using this text. Although heartbreaking at the time.Besides owning the book bought a copy of Audible for a few dollars rather than convert text to speech with Speechify. Mostly because I’d like to revisit the topic multiple times without having to retake screenshots for conversion since Speechify only allows so much storage.My purpose for reading and reviewing regularly for use is in regards to marketing. As an aspiring author will undoubtedly be marketing for the remainder of my life.While also teaching others about as a consultant branding is a means of marketing. How we share reality is hugely important. If we develop a strategy on Bullshit for marketing reflects our brand.In the world today nothing goes away. This is how past transgressions while acceptable ‘then’ aren’t now. We will get called out communally for the newly accepted sin. Which was a sin within lack of conscientiousness or training at the time.Building a brand minus bullshit may be a challenge given how we are raised or fear and even who we focus on. Meaning those in the world we idolize who influence us.This book distinctly petitioned to my mind a particular politician. The obvious bullshit by the definition of the book is so obvious when applied.The other definitions where people believe the lies or BS they promote is a whole different ideology due to intention.The intention of which we are aiming for is distinctive. If we are lying there’s a method to deception with intent as opposed to the bullshitter who doesn’t care one way or another and may or may not believe the crap they’re weaving with a certain message they may know very little about.The pandemic certainly has a measure of a little bit of every description in the book.If you’re gonna make a review comment without reading the book would make for a very simple misunderstanding of the review and my view on the book or the hot topic of the pandemic.I’m merely sharing observations in brief of how the book aroused a need to dig deeper personally. To ensure bullshit is never allowed in brand marketing not encouraged for client growth.It’s my choice to not participate in bullshit or people who exemplify this though before reading the book see how bullshitters had weaseled into my inner circles through life. I laughed at how obvious this is now though at the time can not believe how gullible I was.How I found this book is saw it in a pile Brene Brown had in her office. Why I waited a year to read it through with purpose is to partner with my word of the year, Peace.Every year I pick a word to represent a focus for the 365 days. Rather than my old way of creating a mission and vision statement with ways to accomplish this and a whole lotta reviews of progress, goals, etc.My only goal yearly now is to pick a word. Creatively focus on what this means. Develop a reading list that addresses spaces that interfere with the success of meaning attainment. And, help weed the spaces filled with for lack of a better word bullshit that distracts from what I need, and most of what I want.It’s super easy to pick books about peace. A larger difficulty I’m enjoying is weeding the less obvious challenges.This book has assisted me in recognizing ways I sabotage mental and personal peace tolerating bullshit I wasn’t astutely aware I allowed.Being able to spot the lie is easy. Simple. Mostly. But, bullshit is not so simple. As the person is “never tell a lie when you can bullshit your way through”.“The bullshitter … does not reject the authority of truth, as the liar does … he pays no attention to it at all. By virtue of this, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are”.Being middle-aged having grown up without present parents am fortunate that a few adults demonstrated healthy attitudes about life.It’s been through faith practice I’ve learned what truth and lies are. How they hurt or help. The art of bullshit was never part of life lessons until adulthood.If you’ve never been hurt by a bullshitter or acknowledged the difference between certain politicians to family or people once considered or maybe still do consider friends this might be a great short read for reflection.Buying on Audible to follow along in the book enjoyed this because I could focus on hearing and digesting. Being read to with some books feels like sharing space with a friend, caring person, or sometimes from a teacher depending on the narrator.This book reads as though it’s a serious subject. Though I had difficulty not laughing based on some examples either from my own life or in the world today.This book vibes like clipping sheers to weed a garden. Or, a tiller if you have so much BS in your life that needs constructive acceptance. This book can be a way of cleaning up life’s garden. Making room for more beautiful flowers and landscapes for enjoyment.I’m laughing at the idea the review is so long for such a short book.Bullshit is deep and I’m hoping this review is the pair of boots you need and or want to wade to the book ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ because some of the book spends a lot of time distinguishing humbug from BS that felt excessive for me to make a point.Having a leather-bound copy of such a little book gives a distinct impression of its value. For this, I’m adding back the ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️Though, leaving off my traditional . So not to bullshit the reader into thinking I didn’t notice at least one area that vibed four stars.The overall impact of the book’s meaning is five stars for me. I got a lot out of this little book. Gained improved senses for what BS is. Knowledge for understanding creating wisdom in the insight of choices is always a blessing.Who needs more space for happiness and less anxiety, fear, distraction? Check On Bullshit out for answers to ways to improve and eliminate with awareness.Owning authentically all decisions makes dealing with bullshit way easier. A little TP and flush. Rather than not cleaning these people away from influence.Consider who you follow on media. Associations. Inner circle people. Is it better to adjust now or continue to tolerate what eats away at personal peace?How you brand yourself eill determine how the world sees and the legacy being left for generations.May we all have more piece, happiness, and understanding and less crap that interfere with our well being and that we share with the world❤️

⭐There are books that one wants to buy as soon as we read the title, like this one. A priori, Frankfurt appears as an agent provocateur, as the book is sold on Amazon, where there is a straight no-profanity no-expletives policy. However the book feels a total ploff flop once we start reading, because the expectations were so high, that the book can only fall short.Frankfurt’s intention is to define what BS means, the intention behind the concept, if any, the function/s it serves, and what does it not mean. Through this essay, we get to see some of the characteristics that Frankfurt unearths and attributes to BS. Thus, BS is a deceptive deliberate misrepresentation, short of lying, by word and/or deeds, produced in a careless or self-indulgent manner, unrefined and somewhat spontaneous. Its essence is the lack of connection with truth, an indifference to how things really are. Frankfurt identifies BS as connected to ‘hot air’ or bluff but not as much to nonsense. BS is phony not false, colourful and creative, but not precise or sharp.Frankfurt starts his essay with a cross-examination of the definition of Humbug, as provided by Max Black in 1985. He also compares the meaning and use of the word with the definitions that the Oxford English Dictionary offers of bull, bull session, and BS. He also sketches St Augustine’s typology of lies, and, of course, invites Wittgenstein to the party because the whole essay is a Wittgensteinish exercise.One of the aims of this work is to explain the difference between a lie and BS, and I think that Frankfurt succeeds at doing so, because we get to see clearly how both things are essentially different in intention, conception, format, and presentation. Another of the aims of the book is to discuss whether there is more BS today than before and why, and although the discussion on this subject occupies barely two pages, it is quite good and goes straight to the point.One of the most questionable discussions in the book is, paradoxically, one of the things I enjoyed the most. It revolves about a conversation that Fania Pascal and Wittgenstein had in Cambridge in the 1930s. She was feeling really bad after having her tonsils removed, and told Wittgenstein that she felt like a dog run down by a car, to which the philosopher replied, somewhat upset, “You don’t know what a dog that has been run over feels like.”. To me, the whole point of the discussion between Pascal and Wittgenstein is that she was talking hyperbolically and metaphorically to express how bad she felt and how unwell she was, and, we can guess, to get a bit of friendly support. But she did not get any because Wittgenstein was not really listening to her, he was hearing the words coming out of her mouth and interpreted them literally, as an autistic person would do. She wasn’t implying that she knew how a dog would feel in those circumstances, or that a human and a dog would feel the same, or knew how a dog in those circumstances felt but decided to ignore it for the sake of verbal flourish. The point of the episode is not, like Frankfurt says, on Pascal disregard for reality when she speaks, it is that Pascal and Wittengstein were speaking two different languages because their emphasis is different. Hers is on the flourished colours of her pain. Him is on the literal transcription of reality that he expects from language in a mathematical-like precision. That being the case, to me, the anecdote is pointless in a discussion on the subject at hand.While reading this book, I wondered why the need to give BS ‘a’ definition, or rather one meaning, or so it appeared to me. The Urban Dictionary allows us to appreciate the different shades of the word in common everyday colloquial language. In my personal life, I have had the word speared at me to mean, depending on the context and the person,: 1/ you don’t know what you are talking about (even though I did know what I was talking about). 2/ You are kidding! 3/ You are talking nonsense. 5/ You are lying and you know it, but want to fool me. 6/ I don’t believe you, I don’t want it to be true!The beauty of language (when a precise definition is not needed for the exercise of law, legislation or relevant philosophical analysis, and when the word has not been used for decades or centuries and its meaning is quite established) is that language is alive, fluid, and in constant movement. At times one has to be familiar with the person to ‘get’ the way and meaning s/he uses and gives to a certain word, the context, the colour, the intention. There are words with a definition that most people would agree on, while other words have so many different hues and undertones, that offering an unique definition feels like a corset. So, why reducing a word to a sort of ivory goddess-like monolith with a specific colour, material and varnish? Why trying to define philosophically a word that was never meant to be philosophical or used philosophically? I don’t mean to say that the exercise in the book is pointless or useless, I mean to say that there is not much philosophy behind Bs, Bsiting and Bsiters, and the exercise feels more about how to approach a concept to define it precisely than anything else. Or said differently, it is more about the exercise itself than about the word that the philosopher has chosen for this book. Which is interesting the same.In a way, this book shows (I don’t know whether willingly, as a joke, or whether unwillingly, as an academic exercise gone bananas) the need of the Academia to define colloquial and popular words and concepts to give them a status that they were never meant to have. Or, on the contrary, the need and demand of modern pop culture for its most darling words being stamped with the Academia’s seal of approval and the Academia, in response to the demand, takes a leap of faith and dances with BS itself.At least to me, this work feels as if the author had had a great idea, started to write a book, something had happened, and he had interrupted his work and left the work incomplete. Yet, it is a nice read overall with some good points to ponder.

⭐This topic has always been present in business and professional life, just look at top management in vast majority of successful business organizations. However, topic of Bull* started to dominate political life in last 10 years and it’s threatening to blow apart the very basic thread of social order we enjoyed for the last 75 years. Toxic interaction of fear and distrust on one end (public), and primitive and criminal selfish interests on the other (self-made politicians), is fueling collective destructive energy not seen in the West since 20s and 30s of last century.This little book unmasks well the core of such behavior and motivation for it. However, instead of simply and clearly outlying dangers ahead, it too often strays off into irrelevant details and historical scientific references. Which is a shame because our collective psyche could really use some ideas how to deal with complex everyday problems and related fears, instead of venting them off every 4 years in election booths.In summary, Prof. Frankfurt did well in explaining the difference between telling truth, lying and bull*** People in the first two categories still know there is truth, while ones in the last one simply do not care – and that makes them so seductive and destructive.

⭐This should be required reading for everyone. Literally can’t recommend highly enough. It’s extraordinary how it cuts through so much of the hypocrisy in the world. Just wonderful.

⭐I really don’t read much as I find it hard to get into a book, I can’t sit still easily and focusing on reading is tricky (ADHD)But I read this whole book in 1 sitting and I really liked it

⭐Recommended by an Aussie automotive autotrader, this book is explanatory and presented in a clear and simple format. Not a humorous, flippant read, but entertaining none the less. Reccomended.

⭐Brilliant little book. On bulls*** is an essay on human thinking and society. We are ALL so full of it. Made me realize better how relationships work. We are ALL so self centered. Only drawback that it needs an updated version on ONLINE bulls***. Highly recommended reading for everyone.

⭐Just buy it. Worth every cent.

Keywords

Free Download On Bullshit 1st Edition in PDF format
On Bullshit 1st Edition PDF Free Download
Download On Bullshit 1st Edition 2009 PDF Free
On Bullshit 1st Edition 2009 PDF Free Download
Download On Bullshit 1st Edition PDF
Free Download Ebook On Bullshit 1st Edition

Previous articleWittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond (Representation and Mind series) by Alice Crary (PDF)
Next articleSpinoza: Metaphysical Themes 1st Edition by Olli I. Koistinen (PDF)