Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler by David C. Lindberg (PDF)

Description

Kepler’s successful solution to the problem of vision early in the seventeenth century was a theoretical triumph as significant as many of the more celebrated developments of the scientific revolution. Yet the full import of Kepler’s arguments can be grasped only when they are viewed against the background of ancient, medieval, and Renaissance visual theory. David C. Lindberg provides this background, and in doing so he fills the gap in historical scholarship and constructs a model for tracing the development of scientific ideas. David C. Lindberg is professor and chairman of the department of the history of science at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

User’s Reviews

Editorial Reviews: About the Author David C. Lindberg is Hilldale Professor of History of Science at the University of Wisconsin and past-president of the History of Science Society. His other books include The Beginnings of Western Science, published by the University of Chicago Press.

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐Often referenced in countless papers, this is a classic that lives up to its reputation. I could suggest that anyone interested should explore in further detail the theories of the early philosophers back to to presocratics. For a broad review, it was very interesting and fun to read.

⭐The remarkable achievement of David C. Lindberg’s book, “Theories of Vision From Al-Kindi to Kepler” (1976, 1981) is the series of linkages he establishes between optical theorists from the ancient Greeks through those of the Middle Ages and culminating with Johannes Kepler. By carefully following this thread of continuity, landmark thinkers in the world of optical theory such as Alhazen and Kepler are viewed not as transformative “revolutionary figures” as some commentators have portrayed them, but rather as “culminating figures” within an intellectual tradition. In taking this approach, Lindberg’s account of the history of vision assumes an almost narrative quality which serves to benefit the reader in terms of understanding the “story” of optical thought. It is an important story, Lindberg argues, because for many early thinkers and natural philosophers optics was considered “the most fundamental of the natural sciences, the key that would unlock nature’s door and reveal her innermost secrets” (p. ix). As a result, the study of optics was widespread in the European and Islamic cultures and must be seriously considered in order to gain a broad understanding of early European intellectual history. This becomes readily apparent when Lindberg states that all “early natural philosophers acknowledged that vision is man’s most noble and dependable sense, and the struggle to understand its workings occupied large numbers of scholars for some two thousand years” (p. x).It should be noted that the bulk of Lindberg’s book is occupied with the at times painstakingly detailed explanation of each thinker’s respective theory. Lindberg will also cite extensively from a thinker’s original text, thereby providing the reader with a sense of that thinker’s “voice.” Regardless of the extent to which Lindberg becomes involved in the explication of a particular theory, he is always sure to impress upon the reader the historical and scientific significance of each theorist’s work. In this sense, Lindberg succeeds both on the level of theoretical explication and historical contextualization and continuity.

⭐This book is a great investment. It spears you a lot of time giving you a precise and complete chronological frame concerning theories of vision. Following chronological order Lindberg always compares what the next thinker adds or where exactly is his originality so you can keep track. It’s like history of ideas of theories of vision: an intellectual development of the subject throughout times. So, it’s not purely historical and it’s not purely philosophical.(You can even disagree with some analysis that Lindberg does but he even gives you enough information for you to disagree with him!)The fact that it focuses on theories before Kepler (1571-1630) is in my opinion the book’s greatest virtue – and I have been looking for such a book for a long time! The idea that only something happened when Newton (1643-1727) came along – giving the subject a “proper science” treatment – is truly a poor one. Goethe was right, there’s more to light and color then Newton’s analysis states and before him there’s many impressive approaches that should be considered.If the index sounds strange to you it’s because there’s a lot you need to know!

⭐This book has a glossy new cover, but it is a reprint, and inside the text is horribly printed. The type is swollen and blurry, and there are artefacts everywhere, making it difficult to read.

Keywords

Free Download Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler in PDF format
Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler PDF Free Download
Download Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler 1996 PDF Free
Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler 1996 PDF Free Download
Download Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler PDF
Free Download Ebook Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler