The English and Their History by Robert Tombs (PDF)

Description

A New York Times 2016 Notable BookRobert Tombs’s momentous The English and Their History is both a startlingly fresh and a uniquely inclusive account of the people who have a claim to be the oldest nation in the world. The English first came into existence as an idea, before they had a common ruler and before the country they lived in even had a name. They have lasted as a recognizable entity ever since, and their defining national institutions can be traced back to the earliest years of their history.The English have come a long way from those first precarious days of invasion and conquest, with many spectacular changes of fortune. Their political, economic and cultural contacts have left traces for good and ill across the world. This book describes their history and its meanings from their beginnings in the monasteries of Northumbria and the wetlands of Wessex to the cosmopolitan energy of today’s England. Robert Tombs draws out important threads running through the story, including participatory government, language, law, religion, the land and the sea, and ever-changing relations with other peoples. Not the least of these connections are the ways the English have understood their own history, have argued about it, forgotten it and yet been shaped by it. These diverse and sometimes conflicting understandings are an inherent part of their identity.Rather to their surprise, as ties within the United Kingdom loosen, the English are suddenly embarking on a new chapter. The English and Their History, the first single-volume work on this scale for more than half a century, and which incorporates a wealth of recent scholarship, presents a challenging modern account of this immense and continuing story, bringing out the strength and resilience of English government, the deep patterns of division and also the persistent capacity to come together in the face of danger.

User’s Reviews

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

⭐“The English and Their History” was written by Robert Tombs, professor of French history at Cambridge University. It is an enjoyable read and covers 2,000 years of history in 1,024 pages. Tombs is a fluent, engaging and opinionated writer. The book is crammed full of interesting information but it does not read like a textbook. Tombs tends to focus on the positive aspects of English history and usually gives the English the benefit of the doubt. Tombs often challenges traditional myths and urban legends.Tombs is a proud Englishman and states that: “By the standards of humanity as a whole, England over the centuries has been among the richest, safest and best-governed places on earth, as periodical influxes of people testify.” England has ruled itself for most of its history. It has never lost a war at home since 1066, or been occupied, or suffered a revolution on the scale of those in France in 1789, Russia in 1917 or Germany in 1918. The English, he thinks, have been profoundly fortunate. From the ninth century onwards, it has had a distinctive language, culture, and religion, and has been more prosperous than most of its neighbors. Tombs believes that the English over the past 400 years can take some credit “for their economic and technological labors; for their long pioneering of the rule of law, of accountability and representation in government, of religious toleration and of civil institutions; and for their determined role in the defeat of modern tyrannies.”Tombs begins with the Roman invasion of Britain. Aethelston became the first English king in 937 after defeating the Vikings and uniting the country. The Norman Conquest of 1066 “annihilated England’s ruling class.” He claims that only eight of the 18 kings who ruled between 1066 and 1485 died peacefully in their beds. The Black Death in 1348 reduced the population by more than half. He claims that England fared better than its neighbors in its aftermath. A scarcity of labor and the accumulated legal rights of peasants brought an end to serfdom some 400 years sooner than in most other parts of Europe. Tombs claims that the England of the middle ages was generally peaceful and prosperous. The English avoided further invasion, and the domestic fighting can be compared to gang warfare as it mostly involved the ruling class and their henchmen. The Reformation brought religious violence, though nothing on the scale of Europe’s Thirty Years War, in which eight million died. Religious tensions continued to influence English life for 250 years after the Glorious Revolution of 1688, but they seldom resulted in violence. The English prided themselves on moderation and rejected extremism.English politics in the 18th century was split between the Whigs, who supported American independence, and a Tory government under Lord North that did not. Tombs argues. “To the Whigs, we owe the principle — Magna Carta restated in modern form — that rulers must obey the law and that legitimate authority requires the consent of the people. From the Tories came the principle — fundamental to any political order — that people have no right to rebel against a government because they disagree with it.” Tombs believes that parts of the Declaration of Independence’s indictment against George III are remarkably like Parliament’s accusations against Charles I (“an unlimited and tyrannical power”). Parliament executed Charles I in 1649. Tombs argues that Shakespeare’s depictions of flawed and fallible monarchs entered the national consciousness.Tombs claims that pre-industrial English wages were already the highest in the world—almost 12 grams of silver per day and rising fast for an ordinary London worker in 1775, versus about nine and stagnating in Amsterdam, under four and dropping in Vienna and Florence, a stagnant three in Beijing, and only one in Delhi. He argues that reducing labor costs was one reason why industrialization started in England rather than other then-technologically advanced regions. He argues that cheap labor in France and India ensured that there was no need to invest in spinning jennies and other labor-saving devices.Victory in 1815 over France left the London government ruling “the first global hegemon in history” – a role that only one other power, the US, has ever occupied. Tombs argues that England was ahead of the game compared to other European countries: “no country became so early and so rapidly urban, industrial, rich, (semi-) democratic and intellectually pluralist.” He claims that “during the 19th century, Britain was more outward-looking than any nation before, more involved in its everyday life with more of the world.” Compared with other European nations, England was pre-eminent in politics and economics, although not in the arts. The two-chamber parliament in London, the accountability of ministers to parliament, parliamentary control over government spending, constitutional monarchy, collective cabinet responsibility, and an independent judiciary were emulated across Europe during the next hundred years. The industrial revolution which started in England was copied too.When it comes to WW1, Tombs argues that subsequent generations have tended to see that generation of soldiers as duped victims. Revisionist historians have often maintained that WW1 was an unnecessary war. They claim that the British people were naive and excited about going to war, and they believed that it would be all over by Christmas. Tombs claims this is wrong and unfair. At the time, the British believed they were opposing German militarism and he explains why going to war made sense. Most people knew it would be a long war and it could be disastrous for Britain. The British government concluded that the Germans were not interested in finding a peaceful solution and wanted a war. The British believed that if Germany had defeated France, Britain would be left standing alone and vulnerable to any future aggression. The British concluded that it was necessary to support its allies, France, Russia, and Belgium, even though the country was unprepared for war. Tombs makes clear that the upper classes were patriotic and played their part. Prime Minister Herbert Asquith declared war in 1914 and his oldest son was killed in action in 1916. The current Queen lost an uncle in the conflict. The country’s educated elite also suffered. Many writers and musicians joined up. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis both served in the trenches, as did four future prime ministers (i.e., Churchill, Attlee, Eden, and Macmillan).The empire may be gone, but its legacy of language and law, and political systems endures from California to Calcutta. For Tombs, the empire had “contradictory consequences that include the bad, the good and the indifferent.” To those who see it as nefarious, he counters that the “real alternatives to British hegemony would probably have been conquests by others, or perhaps global anarchy.” By about 1200 slavery in the British Isles was non-existent. England’s colonies in the Americas introduced slavery in the 1600s even though it was illegal at home. Britain outlawed the international slave trade in 1807 and until 1870, its navy had a squadron permanently based in West Africa to stop slave ships from leaving the continent. In 1834, all 800,000 slaves in Britain’s colonies were emancipated by an act of Parliament. Tombs is skeptical of claims that the industrial revolution, and thus English prosperity, was the result of imperialism and slavery. Tombs claimed that even at its peak the empire never contributed more than 6% to Britain’s GDP. Tombs states that few people in England were ever directly involved in the empire, it was about 1.5% of the population, including the soldiers, missionaries, and their families.Tombs claims that the British have been worried about national decline since the 1880s. After 1917 the US rose to global supremacy and by the 1940s, American wealth and power dwarfed that of Britain. Like every European state, it was inevitably consigned to second-tier status. He argues that the Dunkirk evacuation in 1940 is “the most moving saga in our history”, and Allied victory over Germany in 1945 would have been impossible without Britain’s refusal to sue for peace, her control of the seas, her planning of the D-Day landings and her aerial bombing campaign. Much of the problem with England’s self-image in recent times has been in adapting to the rest of the world catching up.England’s relationship with Europe looms large in the book. England is located on the fringes of Europe, and its rulers have been pre-occupied with national security since Julius Caesar’s failed invasions in 55 and 54 BC. The English have beaten off most European invaders since then. Europe has often seemed more of a threat than a friend. Most of the country’s greatest heroes and rulers have usually been involved in defending the country from European invasion (e.g., Churchill, Nelson, Wellington, Elizabeth I). Tombs argues that Britain also had a very different experience in the 20th century to other EU countries. It was not one of the aggressors, it was not invaded or occupied, and it remained a democracy. The British relied on help from outside Europe to survive the war. Its EU neighbors had either been invaded, claimed neutrality, or were allied with Germany. As a result, its people have a different perspective on Europe than Germany, France. Ireland or Italy. This book provides a useful guide to the English people and their history.

⭐Reading this book for a book club, a few chapters per meeting. Its incredibly interesting, almost every page I am asking myself how I could possible not have known this history! Its enjoyable, informative, and very well researched. As just a regular person, who loves reading history, I really have enjoyed this book.

⭐The author should be commended for his thoroughness and the sheer effort it must have taken to cover the vast sweep of English history in this lengthy volume. For someone with little previous background on the subject, the cavalcade of rulers, successional battles, clerics, wars, and movements is perhaps simply too much. One can get lost in the details. As an American who is already sensitive to the tendency within the U.S historical tradition toward nationalism and apologetics for misdeeds, I found the chauvinism of the author amusing at first, but after hundreds of pages of “well, the French were worse,” and the “colonized people invited us in,” I became irritated at Tombs’ apparently unapologetic flag-waving. Every negative event, deed, or movement associated with the English is mentioned briefly and then followed by a “yeah, but” of some type. I think some clear-eyed, critical analysis of the darker aspects of the English experience would have made for a more powerful and credible book. I will add that, although Tombs does make some effort to include discussion of the lived experience of ordinary English folk, overall, the book follows the hackneyed historical tradition in which political leaders and wars serve as the primary focus. Within historiography as a whole, there has evolved in recent decades more interest in social history, including a view of the past “from the bottom up.” This work could have used a bit more of an E.P. Thompson-sequel focus on the working class and bit less endless discussion of Whigs, Tories, kings, queens, and prime ministers. I infer that Tomb’s purpose was, in fact, to write a history that would make English readers feel proud of their heritage. There is certainly much to be proud of, and I do not begrudge the English their pride. But the patriotic editorializing weakens the book as a work of serious historical analysis.

⭐This is a very good history of England right up until 1940. After that, there are two things wrong: first, the author made it sound like the British beat Hitler all on their own, with maybe a small contribution by the USSR and the US. Second, the portion since the war is too much his political views rather than history. That may be inevitable in a history of the modern era, but it made it less interesting.

⭐At last! What a huge debt we owe to Professor Robert Tombs who has written the most balanced and at last ‘sympathetic’ story of the English warts and all, instead of the constant diet of our failings which seems to have been the fashionable take on our history for most of the last century and this. I have been so ground down with the ‘sackcloth and ashes’ interpretation of ourselves in the mainstream that it has come as a ray of sunshine to find out that there is much to be proud of in our story not least espousing free trade and abolishing slavery, the first country in human history to do so! It is joyful too that it is 2000 years of our history right up to 2014 so it is incredibly useful in getting an understanding of our post war tribal politics. A must read for us all, so much so, that it is going to be a Christmas present for my children and grandchildren whether they like it or not!!!

⭐This book stands out from the crowd for the following reasons:1) The author uses evidence from economic and social history sources to give an idea of what life was like for ordinary people, eschewing the usual approach of over-focusing on royalty.2) He discusses the development of English national identity, language and literature, and incidentally destroys the arguments that national identity began in the late 18th century.3) The book draws widely from a remarkable array of sources and is meticulously referenced.4) The author is an expert in French history and this shows in his excellent explanations of the impact of European wars and politics on England. The sections on the impact of the French Revolution, on the Napoleonic Wars and on WW1 and WW2 really sparkle.5) Last, but not least, the author is positive towards English history. This makes him stand out from the self-flagellating left-wing historians who overlook England’s amazing contribution to science, technology, economics, law and politics that has benefitted mankind so much.Thanks to Robert Tombs for a thorough explanation of our history.

⭐This is an easy to read, ambitious attempt to chronicle the fascinating history of England in one book. It particularly excels on the coverage of the English Civil War and religious division post Henry VIII.Sadly the author’s political bias becomes all the more prevalent as the book continues. Culminating in a ranting attack on Labour (who he never disguises his contempt for) and what I’m sure he sees as the left and their ideals, particularly the NHS. I forgot I was reading a history book at one point.I don’t expect authors to completely remove their opinions but this veered into the territory of a libertarian thinkers blog post. A shame because generally it is a enjoyable read.Also uses the word shibboleth far too much.

⭐This is a wonderful book. I bought it when it came out but read it only after Brexit! What I like most is the clarity of its prose, the sureness of its judgement and the constant discovery of fascinating details about the English. I specially like the way he weaves economics, politics, high culture and low quite seamlessly together. Towards the end one senses author fatigue as he gallops through the final years of his survey, but do not let that influence you; 99% is just superb.

⭐Especially at this confusing time, this book puts our place in or near Europe in an essential context. There is always a tendency to view the present as the end of history and, of course, it never is. Mr Tombs has done us a great service with this book, giving us a historical view of us, our place in the world, our effect upon it and vice versa. He’s also made it informative, entertaining and spiced with humour and a bit of irony to boot. I haven’t finished the book but am so impressed that I’d like to recommend it, especially as I detect his underlying theme is that we’re not done for yet!

Keywords

Free Download The English and Their History in PDF format
The English and Their History PDF Free Download
Download The English and Their History 2015 PDF Free
The English and Their History 2015 PDF Free Download
Download The English and Their History PDF
Free Download Ebook The English and Their History